pokój dziecka - Impossible Puzzle!
  1. Strona główna


Nazwa

Impossible Puzzle!

Rating

4.2339935

Widzało

2570328

Trwa

01:06

Kategoria

Science & Technology

Polecam wam - tu - przyłącza elektryczne lublin.

brusspup
    Dyskusja, komentarze:
  • Famous puzzle. It's actually a hoax. The top slanted piece is not a triangle, in the middle of the bottom side the angle changes slightly, and the pieces that correspond to each side have very subtle differences in angle, so that when you rearrange them they appear to still have the same angle.  - The Modern Shoe
  • This is fake. He used special effects to make this work. If you slice an area up into different sections, and rearrange the sections, it will never leave any space more or less than original area. It will always fill up completely. - Fimontronia
  • I FIGURED IT OUT!!! :) First, look at the little "gun" shapes. 0:07- They're all pushed together, so there's no square. Plus, It's longer (length wise) and shorter (height wise). 0:13- It's on top of the other one, making it shorter (length wise) and longer (height wise). Since the width is bigger, there's obviously going to be a square. Next, you have to look at the "half pentagon". The bigger one is longer and taller. The smaller one is shorter and shorter (length wise). The triangle also slants down over to the left, so the smaller one fits easily. The bigger one, however, takes up more space to the right. The smaller one doesn't reach as close to the bottom as the big one. So, due to the lack of length and more height, you have to push them up so that the make the square. However, when you put them back into the first arrangement, the smaller one gives it more length and the bigger one gives it less height, giving it the ability to cover the others area. Not really an illusion, just adapting to its surroundings. :) - Livvy Productions
  • SIMPLE! Angles are the same, watch the little pieces; how they stack on top of each other. When you move the skinny slanted piece up, the square ends of the small pieces stack on top of each other. When you put the big slanted piece in place, the square ends of the small pieces sit over the ends do to the added width. Length you say? Indeed, keep in mind, the short side of each slant is the same thus they will both fit the short length on the left side. The small slant is not as wide giving it it's shorter appearance. If you increased the width of the small slant to the same width as the large one, it would reach an equal height to the large slant on the tall side. Both slants are exactly the same angle and short side height, the width is just simply reduced on the shorter slant. Nothing difficult here, very easy geometry.  I'd cut this out of a cardboard box right in front of you, there is nothing special here at all.  - Dragon Steel
  • все российские машины построены на этом принципе. Все удивляются как они ездят. Автомат Калашникова тоже построен на этом принципе :) - Марсель Марселев
  • It doesn't matter if there is a "missing space" because the area that is enclosed is still the same for both arrangements of the two smaller pieces - ironfallout
  • I find it so funny that people are baffled by this! It's one of the easiest "puzzles" (if you can call it that) out there. What's even more hilarious is the title of the video which states the puzzle is impossible as if it's defying the laws of physics... I had a great laugh, thanks.  - RSQuickSave
  • HOLY MOTHERFUCKING ASS SUCKING ALIEN DICK MIND BLOWING !!!!!  - BMXXMB16
  • All he actually did was he switched the bottom right pieces to fit the puzzle when he changed the Other pieces with horizontal lines. - zak dzon
  • Try to do this with metal plates - mixuaquela123
  • This is cool because the surface area of the yellow never changes, neither does the grey. but when you rearrange the grey, There is a gap even though there shouldn't be. - Random1234514
  • This trick works on chocolate bars too. Take a 24 piece chocolate bar and cut certain pieces out, then rearrange it and you have the same amount of pieces, in the bar, with one square left over on the side. - Kaipyro67ALT
  • You notice that it is much harder to fit the pieces in their places when the space is there. - Xenath Cytrin
  • Does anyone have a link to an explanation video??? - Ultimate Gaming
  • ... Are evryone blind? The biger pic is wider and taller  - TnT™ Graphic designer
  • there's a noticeable difference in compression between the two options. i think they're either sponge-like pieces (not as much as a sponge but slightly compressable) and therefore able to compress and spread the compression out between all the pieces, so it's not noticeable, or the gaps between the loose pieces in the first option can be added up to make the square when reducing the space in between with a little pressure. but probably a mixture of the two.  - R0DSTER
  • THIS VIDEO IS SOO FUCKING AMAZIN IT CHANGED MY HOLY LIFE  - BMXXMB16
  • It's easy... - Oel Over
  • its not fake ¬¬ the square appears because the pieces are pressed more to the borders, you can see the difference in preassure, at the beggining he has 0 problem taking out the first two pieces but when he tries to put the back he has to applu some force that means they are more pressed together. - Lucious Dinh
  • Explanation: The area where the two identical pieces were put remains the same, however its shape doesn't. Try it: draw 2 different rectangles that cover up the same area. Draw 2 shapes that fit one of the rectangles and cut the shapes out. Place them over the 2nd rectangle. Doesn't fit perfectly ,huh?  - MrPijus123
  • Very interesting concept and a great idea! - Stream Line Raider
  • The triangles do not have the same gradient. Similar, but not the same. That's why there's a square after the triangles have been moved. This was not accomplished by special effects. - Myzenan
  • If you take the template and take the surface area of the back and the surface area of the pieces we find that the surface area of the pieces is a bit smaller than that of the backboard, suggesting that the pieces never filled the area to begin with. I have no idea how, but the math proves it. - Hyrum Diesen
  • Unable to see out the remaining sections of the parts due to the camera angle - Carpe Diem
  • te first time ste spaces between the parts where looser later their were tighter and the free space from between the parts was a rectange in adifferent place. - Jan Bojarski
  • People are so stupid omg... He rearranged the pieces the first time he switched them so that in the end when he rearranges it for the second time, its the exact same shape that he started with.  - Lorena Omana
  • Now remake the illusion using rigid pieces like steel or ceramic tiles. Let's see you try and squeeze or deform the pieces to create the magical space out of nowhere.  - krisspykrapper
  • This isn't fake, but can be explained by the fact that it is originally a little looser in the frame. When he switches it around, you can see that it's significantly tighter. If you take that small amount of space from before and put it together, it makes sense that there'd be that much of a hole left over. - jjaapp18
  • why does the template not load - Gustavo Cisneros
  • He actually just changed two pieces at the rearrangement! - Justin Jaeger
  • The top one is longer in length and width left one is small which makes a gap there - Brandon Ward
  • Recreate the puzzle using pieces that can't squeeze and push the borders. Try making the pieces out of steel and the border our of steel, see if you can recreate the effect. - Serp1313
  • the 1st one had some gaps between the pieces.. in the 2nd one the user had to struggle to place the pieces, as they were fixed completely, where as in the 1st one, he put the pieces easily, as there was a lot of space... - vennam anand
  • Empty area magicly appears.... GO CHARMANDERR!! - erich sertori
  • I don't get it. You just put it back.  - SilentKnight1000
  • It's not impossible. You switched the two square-like figures around so they could make room for one of the bottom pieces to be put on top of the other, when they were suppose to be side by side, creating the hole. - Jay H
  • How is that possible - Shaunna Opperman
  • lol people actually saying special effects?. YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW SHAPES WORK!!!.  - tane tumb
  • The bigger square-ish thing had more length than the smaller one, so when you switch them, it leaves more space on the bottom for the little things and leaves a square. - MuSic Infinity
  • Nothing is created, nothing dissapears, everything just transform. - CHKW100
  • This isn't false. I know the secret behind this, but I'm not saying what it is. - MagecraftFTW
  • Problem solved. Geez thats easy - hanz cruz
  • Wpis sponsorowany: badź pierwszy zgłoś się.